Demonstration document — the fictional Alderfield Home store. No live store was inspected.
Stage 1 of 4 — the full diagnosis · this is the complete picture of your catalogue. This document diagnoses; it proposes no corrections and asks you to decide nothing. If you decide to have it put right, stage 2 is your Merchant Review Pack inside a Catalogue Fix Sprint — and stage 3, the Re-check, reports what actually went live.
AI-Commerce Readiness Audit
This Audit evaluates the information your products need in order to be understood accurately — by buyers, and by the AI shopping systems that read your catalogue for them. We read every product in scope: your catalogue data and your product pages — the evidence your store publishes today, and nothing else. The result is {{ nFindings }} catalogue issues, grouped into {{ nPatterns }} recurring issues you can inspect below, product by product.
What this means for improvement
{{ improvementLead }} Behind {{ nOwnEstablished }} of the {{ nFindings }} issues, your own store already states the answer — the issue is that your catalogue data does not carry it. A further {{ nResearchEligible }} facts your store cannot establish qualify for bounded research into official sources — resolution work the Fix Sprint performs after you buy it, validated against the exact product before anything is proposed. Nothing has been changed and nothing is proposed yet: this document diagnoses, and unresolved evidence stays held with us rather than becoming homework.
The Fix Sprint turns these catalogue issues into exact catalogue changes — every one shown to you in full before anything is implemented. What fixing this involves ↓
¹ {{ nExclusions }} non-merchandise items (48 swatches & samples, 11 gift cards, 9 shipping-protection & fee SKUs, 4 placeholder SKUs) were excluded from product counts.
Buyers need certain facts before they can choose with confidence. For each fact this Audit evaluates, here is where the answer stands across your {{ nProducts }} products — held in your catalogue data, found elsewhere on your store, conflicting, missing, or not assessable. Each state resolves differently, so they are never collapsed into one number.
The requests beside each row are illustrative. The Audit evaluates the underlying catalogue facts, not a fixed list of natural-language questions.
{{ cv.notes }}
Many product pages also publish a structured product record — the machine-readable data an AI shopping system reads first. We measured what those records actually carry against the facts we established.
One product, as an AI shopping system meets it
An AI shopping system relying on that product record would not receive this product's {{ exFactLower }} from it. The value is already established, so closing the gap is correction work a Fix Sprint carries — no decision from you.
Fact by fact, on the products where the record was measured
Catalogue-level summary — per-fact detail is turned off
{{ repGapLine }}
{{ repTopGaps }}
Measured absence — the whole record
{{ repWholeLine }}
{{ wholeTitle }} {{ wholeSku }}{{ wholeRead }}{{ wholeNote }}Not measured — and therefore not a gap
{{ repUnmeasuredLine }} They sit outside every count in this section, and no correction is proposed for them.
One record disagreeing with the established fact
{{ cfTitle }} {{ cfSku }}established: {{ cfTruth }}published record: {{ cfRead }}{{ cfNote }}The kinds of problems that affect multiple products in your catalogue, grouped by what is actually wrong. Each issue is explained once, with one representative example; every affected product is one click away in the product index.
{{ fam.blurb }}
Two of your own surfaces disagree
{{ pt.reading }}
Both statements are yours, and the evidence we hold does not establish which of them overrides the other. So this Audit does not choose between them and does not write a value here. The exact wording of each, and every product it touches, is below.
{{ pt.reading }}
Why it matters{{ pt.matters }}
These {{ nNothingEstablishes }} facts remain incomplete: some establish no value, others establish components but not the complete fact. Nothing is guessed, so nothing is proposed for them yet. Across the catalogue, {{ nResearchEligible }} facts your store cannot establish qualify for bounded research into official sources — the maker's or brand's own published material, an official supplier, an authoritative registry — and that research is work the Fix Sprint performs, validating any result as this exact product before proposing a change.
{{ ue.note }} E.g. {{ ue.example }}.
Established components: {{ ue.components }}
{{ quote.where }}
“{{ quote.text }}”
{{ ue.searched }}
Your own published terms state “{{ sr.quote }}” — {{ sr.why }}
Covered by this record ({{ sr.scopeCount }}): {{ sr.scope }}
Excluded by its own wording ({{ sr.excludedCount }} · {{ sr.exclusionTerms }}): {{ sr.excluded }}
Rugs and lighting are your strongest areas — most answer everything already. These {{ nWithoutFinding }} products require no action, and none of them generated an issue.
The complete catalogue, product by product. Every row carries authoritative identity, option axes and a live-page link. Open it to see exact evidence and consequence where issues exist, the useful completed-inspection outcome where none exists, or the explicit inspection limit where no conclusion was possible.
{{ viewNote }}
Showing {{ apxShowing }} of {{ apxCount }} matching · {{ apxTotal }} in the catalogue. No product is excluded from this index.
{{ row.stateLabel }} {{ row.summaryText }}
{{ e.reading }}
{{ e.askedLabel }}{{ e.asked }}
We inspected all {{ nProducts }} catalogue records, usable product pages and published product data — your store's current evidence, and nothing else. {{ nPageExceptions }} pages could not support page-dependent conclusions — they are flagged in the index and carry no issues.
Your catalogue data — read for all {{ nProducts }} products in scope. It is where a fact can be stated once and read the same way every time, and where a correction lands.
Product pages — {{ nPagesAcquired }} of {{ nProducts }} usably fetched. A fact that lives only here is real — it is simply not stated in your structured data.
The published product record, where a page publishes one — {{ repMethodNote }}. Read to completion or reported as not measured, never inferred from page prose.
Nothing outside your store. This Audit diagnoses from your current evidence only. Where a missing fact qualifies for bounded research into official sources, that research is Fix Sprint work — performed after purchase and validated as this exact product before anything is proposed.
Exceptions. {{ nPageNoResponse }} pages did not return a usable response, {{ nPageUnavailable }} were unavailable, and {{ nPageNotBound }} could not be established as the product's own page. No absence was concluded from any of them. {{ nExclusions }} non-merchandise items (swatches, samples, gift cards, fees, placeholders) were set aside from product counts.
This audit is the diagnosis, and it stands on its own — everything above is yours to act on however you like. If you'd like us to put it right with you, that work is a Catalogue Fix Sprint.